Thursday, 19 November 2015

Fantasyland of Bakerworld

The fantasy world of Esther Baker becomes ever more bizarre. I suppose since she claims to suffer from 'complex PTSD' along with a few other things, and admits she has severe memory problems- even when just trying to recall back a couple of years ago - so perhaps her retreat into fantasy is part of that whole process?

Here is Baker admitting to those problems

Just to set the thing in context, Baker was commenting about one of her many ads for her several claimed businesses at the time, namely Maranatha Creations - a wedding stationary printers
Here it is having just set up in a small new redbrick court in Conisbrough, a few miles from her & husbands marital home & registered business address in Thrybergh Rotherham

Note  here, she is claiming 'many years experience' even in  2010
She disputes the ad  was 2010, and claims instead it was 'probably 2012, or 2013

 Now, 2010 was the year she got married, and also the year they set up shop in Conisbrough S YKS
which would mean paperwork, leases, equipment moving to several miles away, and someone working there. A fairly eventful time you might think, but apparently Baker cannot place this period with her ad, & wants to claim it was 2012 or 2013, which it clearly wasn't if you look in the review section, there is a review dated Nov 2010, so it's quite clear it was no later than that -though I suspect the positive review was her own work lol.
Advertising is the sort of thing you do when setting up a new business, but Baker's self declared severe memory problems seem to have kicked in - the sort you might have incidentally when claiming you ran a business for 5 years on linkedin - &  yet claim a mere 3 months on twitter for the same business involvement when it suits your purpose. Memory is such a fragile thing it seems

Here is Bakers Linkedin 'cv' note Platinum Pub Services she claims to have run from march 2008, to Jan 2013, almost 5 years

Apparently although on Linkedin,  she claims she ran PPS for almost 5 years, on twitter she contradicts this & says it was just a mere 3 months
Bit of a difference between 3 months and 5 years, but not apparently in Bakerworld
work is well, 'flexible' in definition and length

Here Baker declares her 'work ethic', perhaps she includes her twitter time too since Jan 2015 she has clocked up over 32k tweets in that period, & seems to live on twitter, desperately seeking attention

She declares she has worked full time since she was 15. Now legally children,  in this case those who have not attained the age of 16 & left school, are generally not legally allowed to work full time.Indeed Bakers own 'cv' or fairy tale, puts her at school in Walsall at this period. That's school as in full time between 8/9am and approx 4pm, the sort of normal working hours in other words.But Baker seems to be having the same memory problems here too.
She also claims she was sexually passed around in some group about this time, sleeping with 'hundreds of men' she claims, whilst still at school, or at full time work, which ever variation of the Baker fairy story you wish to believe.Either way these accounts of her past seem to have memory questions surrounding them.

According to her Linkedin profile, she then moved on to 6th form ( her previous school didn't have a 6th form) at Queen Mary's Grammar School Walsall, which did have one. That would be another 2 years of school work, which although possible to combine with some part-time work, doesn't reconcile with the claim of having worked FT since 15
Then it's off to Nottingham University to study Sociology for a year, again it's difficult to see how that translates into FT work in the normal understanding of the term, but apparently in Bakerworld, it does
But then she claims she worked in her business, Platinum Pub Services for 5 years on Linkedin, but on twitter says actually it was just a mere 3 months
So Baker claims on linkedin, she was at school till 16, 6th form thereafter at QM grammar school, followed by a year at Nottingham University - apparently an unbroken chronological chain, whilst also working FT, and also being, totally controlled and  sexually abused over this very same period by some ruthless sex gang, who as ruthless sex gangs go, let her out to continue her education or work full time, which ever of the two you believe, if indeed one believes either.
 It is difficult to reconcile some of these claims

 In response to the latest Baker script changes

The latest amendment to the Baker script is she simply forgot that two years ago she opened her shop, then closed it a couple of months later if we are to go by her Linkedin claim
Obviously it's that impaired memory, the same impaired memory that claimed she had never met an MP, a mere 6 days  after meeting at least 4 at the  House of Commons- one gets so blase about these things . It's so hard to remember everything, but fortunately, she did remember when finally opening her shop, she had some three years prior to opening, placed an ad for her business on some obscure webspace, so went and altered it having also recalled the 3yr old password. Even though she was essentially running a mail order business

But it's important to get these small details right - well some anyway.After all the ad partly related to Baker's other claimed business outlets, this time on ebay - which is surprising because there is no mention, reference or hint of it in the ad text.
No sign, no ebay ID or feedback responses, shurely a missed opportunity - but i'm sure that must have been altered too - obviously.*Shuffles script around*  since her OH is she claims, the one who she is afraid of finding her, he must have known the ID, she couldn't continue to use it at her new Liverpool address without obvious risk, so leaving it on the site wasnt any risk at all once it was abandoned, as the address associated with it was their Thrybergh one.And the ad appears unaltered.

It is of course not possible to argue the ad wasn't posted in 2010, much as im sure some scratched their heads in vain  trying, as it is reviewed in that year. Which leaves only an amendment as an option
Wonder how long it took the committee to work that one out lol

So Baker doesn't recall opening her shop just two years ago in 2013 first time, but needs to consult before she can recall, but she did manage to recall at the time of opening, that she needed to amend an old Ad of 3 years ago at that time, even though the address amendment is fairly inconsequential, and fortunately someone recalled the password too-bless em. Selective memory obviously
Then a few months after opening, the shop closes - but no mention or amendment to the Ad then it appears, even though Linkedin is later changed to reflect the closure of the business

But the latest Baker script change is Baker claims to have run pubs since she was 19. An early age but then her OH is over 10 years older - thats the OH she claims bought her from the sex trade gang, who totally controlled her physically & mentally, and insisted she go to school & take her gcse's & A levels, followed by a brief stint at University, as well as allegedly working full time -obviously an enlightened sex trade gang with a 72 hour working day
But having been bought off this gang & fearful the gang would  renege & return to find her, and quite possibly insist she go back to University, she fled & went into hiding by advertising herself and business' all over the internet lol. You just can't be too careful with security

But no mention of the publican trade on Linkedin, even though it appears in the latest script that its the longest running claim. Well, it's so hard to think of everything obviously lol

Baker is quite likely one of the most prolific liars I can recall. It's almost like breathing with her. One lie follows another, which follows another, all to try to get her own way.She appears to take an almost fanatical dislike to the point of intense hatred for certain people, almost instantly and without any apparent foundation, that's even from the 'start' of her twitter experience.First Lavery, then McFadyen, somewhere along the line, Emmerson - & so it goes on
If correct, it may explain why she could latch on to people in some crazed vendetta without any apparent reason.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.